Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
Congressional Democrats and Republicans agree on a need for a
reliable US electricity grid that is resilient against climate
extremes, though their approaches continue to differ along partisan
lines.
"It's a reality check that we need to make our electric grid and
energy infrastructure far more resilient to climate change,"
Representative Frank Pallone, Democrat-New Jersey, who chairs the
US House of Representatives' Energy and Commerce Committee, said at
the start of an 18 February hearing on decarbonizing the US energy
sector.
Pallone's remarks resonated with both Republicans and Democrats
on the committee in a week when the electrical grid in Texas has
been overwhelmed by a surge in demand for power.
The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the state's
grid operator, said the transmission network was unable to cope
because the unexpectedly frigid temperatures that have gripped the
state since late 14 February downed power lines and froze natural
gas wellheads, pipelines, and power plant equipment, including wind
turbine blades.
"It was a failure to recognize that the 100-year storms of
yesterday may now be the every 10-year storms of today," Pallone
said, adding "these major outages also show that the climate crisis
doesn't differentiate between red states and blue states: the whole
nation is being impacted by the climate crisis."
ERCOT also said the challenge for the state was to meet the
demand for power, which Texas mostly generates from natural gas,
coal, and nuclear plants, and to a lesser extent from wind
farms.
A reliable grid
The top-ranking Republican on the Energy and Commerce Committee,
Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Washington State, also
acknowledged that "the importance of reliability has been on full,
heart-wrenching display this week in Texas, the South, and the
Midwest."
Republican Representative Michael Burgess, of Texas, said he
welcomed suggestions to improve the reliability and resiliency of
the grid. "This is not a partisan issue," Burgess said. "No one
cares which party this comes from when they want heat and light and
water."
However, Pallone and Representative Bobby Rush,
Democrat-Illinois, who heads the House Energy Subcommittee,
differed with Burgess and Rodgers on the best approach to improving
the grid.
"Getting the United States in the lead on the clean energy game
is essential," Rush said. He warned about the "severe consequences
of inaction," as he pointed to the 4.3 million customers without
electricity who endured frigid temperatures normally only seen many
hundreds of miles to the north.
Clean Electricity Standard
Pallone called for a national clean electricity standard in the
updated version of comprehensive climate legislation known as the
Clean Future Act, which he expects to formally introduce in the
coming weeks. A year ago, Pallone, Rush and other Democrats had
introduced a discussion draft of this bill,
but never formally introduced it.
During the hearing, Pallone promised that a clean electricity
standard would not only help reduce greenhouse gases that are
driving climate change, but also lead to a resilient grid.
However, Rodgers warned against "top-down, one-size-fits-all
mandates and costs on Americans, which will threaten our nation's
energy dominance and our national security."
During the hearing, Pallone also questioned why Texas was caught
unawares despite experiencing similar cold-weather driven outages
in 2011 that resulted in a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) investigation, and subsequent report.
FERC announced 16 February that it
and the North American Reliability Council will investigate the
recent power outages across south central and Midwest states and
report. Pallone said the energy committee too would investigate the
Texas crisis further, but decide what other action to take after
FERC has reported its findings.
ERCOT questioned
While Burgess did not comment on FERC's earlier findings, he has
joined other members of the state congressional delegation in
writing to ERCOT demanding an explanation for the agency's response
to the outages. In a 17 February letter, Burgess
asked ERCOT to explain how it had prepared for this weather event
and anticipated energy demand prior to when the controlled rolling
shutoffs began.
Burgess has also asked ERCOT to explain how various sources of
power generation were affected and operated during the crisis,
especially as opponents of renewable power have been quick to blame
wind generation for the outages in the Lone Star State.
However, gas-fired power plants are responsible for 65.7% of the
power supply in Texas, while coal-fired plants make up 15.9%, and
nuclear generation supplies 6%. Wind contributes 9% of the power
mix, according to ERCOT's winter fuels data.
ERCOT documents reveal it had prepared for a worst-case
scenario, but the demand for power, coupled with the magnitude of
the outages, far exceeded what it had envisioned. The agency's
2020/2021 Winter Adequacy Resource Assessment estimated about 13
gigawatts (GW) of planned outages as a worst-case scenario. On 16
February, at least 31 GW of power remained offline in Texas. ERCOT
reported a record demand for 69 GW, which was 3 GW greater than its
worst-case scenario.
Posted 18 February 2021 by Amena Saiyid, Senior Climate & Energy Research Analyst, IHS Markit