Which issuers and investors will be most affected by the SEC’s proposal to increase the 13F threshold to $3.5B? Dis… https://t.co/UKslPvikv2
The ETF Rule Proposal: Key Takeaways
The SEC ruled that there will be no differentiation in the rule set between active and passively managed ETFs. While they considered different treatment for passive ETFs (with specific data disclosure rules around tracking error being touted for passive funds), the SEC decided against it. This was a deliberate move by the SEC, as there is a proliferation of highly customized and methodologically complex indices that have rendered the difference between actively and passively managed ETFs irrelevant in their eyes. In the past, it was typically more difficult to obtain approval for actively managed ETFs due to perceived increased investment risk, so this change could lead to growth in active management.
IHS Markit provides industry-leading data, software and technology platforms and managed services to tackle some of the most difficult challenges in financial markets. We help our customers better understand complicated markets, reduce risk, operate more efficiently and comply with financial regulation.
Follow Financial Services
- SEC’s 13F Proposal – Issuer and Investor Analysis
- Securities Finance: July 2020
- Daily Global Market Summary - 6 August 2020
- IHS Markit Credit Index Volumes H1 2020
- Vendor Assessments Meet Location Risk
- Securities Finance: 2020 mid-year review
- iBoxx ALBI Monthly Update: Aug 2020
- iBoxx SGD Monthly Update: August 2020
As global supply chains become increasingly complex, it is more important than ever to incorporate location risk in… https://t.co/AGIbLCp7LP