Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
On 16 May, Malaysia's Ministry of Finance repealed the Goods and
Services Tax (GST), thereby fulfilling one of the key election
campaign promises of the new government's 100-day programme,
despite widespread concern over how lost revenue will be
funded.
On 15 May, Anwar Ibrahim, a leader of the newly elected Hope's
Pact (Pakatan Harapan: PH) coalition government, was released from
prison after being granted a full royal pardon. Separately, on 16
May, the new Ministry of Finance effectively repealed the Goods and
Services Tax (GST).
Both measures met the PH's election campaign promises due to be
fulfilled soon after taking office.
The PH will probably remain internally stable until a
by-election is triggered for Anwar's entry to the parliament, which
is a prerequisite for him to assume the premiership; there is
currently no elected alternative to Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad
within the PH who can navigate the interests of its four
parties.
The repeal of the GST will probably be followed with further
populist measures such as the reintroduction of fuel subsidies, but
balancing measures to trim public expenditure, possibly involving
scaling back large infrastructure projects, are probable.
On 15 May, Anwar Ibrahim, a leader of the newly elected Hope's
Pact (Pakatan Harapan: PH) coalition government, was released from
prison, three weeks ahead of his previously scheduled release date
of 8 June. Before his release, he was granted a full royal pardon,
making him eligible once again to enter the parliament, which is a
prerequisite for current Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad
to be able to transfer the premiership to him.
Separately, on 16 May, the Ministry of Finance repealed the
Goods and Services Tax (GST) by reducing the rate from the current
6% to 0%, effective from 1 June. On 17 May, as an alternate
revenue-generating measure, the ministry introduced the Sales and
Services Tax (SST), although no tax rate was announced. Both
measures were part of the PH's election campaign promises and were
meant to be fulfilled soon after taking office.
Coalition likely to remain stable until by-election for
PH leader The stability of the PH relies on the balance of power
between Mahathir and Anwar and is particularly sensitive to the
transition of the premiership from the former to the latter.
Following Anwar's release that effectively implies that the PH now
has two strong leaders, this introduces an ongoing challenge to
future coalition stability. However, the PH will probably remain
stable until a by-election is triggered to facilitate Anwar's entry
to the parliament. The share of seats within the PH is favorable
for Anwar to influence the coalition's direction, as his People's
Justice Party (Parti Keadilan Rakyat: PKR) holds 47 of the PH's 113
seats, compared with 11 seats held by Mahathir's Malaysian United
Indigenous Party (Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia: PPBM). Other than
Mahathir, there is currently no elected representative within the
PH whom we assess to be capable of leading the coalition and
navigating the interests of its four parties.
Anwar has stated he is not seeking an entry into the parliament
for another year to give Mahathir space to govern. In the one-year
outlook, Anwar's wife and current deputy prime minister, Wan
Azizah, is expected to resign from her seat to refute claims that
Anwar's family is engaging in dynastic politics, thereby triggering
a by-election in which Anwar can stand.
Repeal of GST signals government intent to uphold
election campaign promises
The PH's campaign promise of repealing the GST, part of its
10-point 100-day programme, had been important to its electoral
prospects given discontent among voters facing higher living costs.
The Ministry of Finance's decision to repeal the GST within the
timeline - despite concerns about the potential loss of fiscal
revenues - is indicative of the government's intent to uphold its
election promises. A subsequent introduction of the SST, designed
partly to offset the lost revenues from the GST, will probably be
more acceptable at the popular level, given that the new sales tax
will be levied on manufacturers rather than consumers.
Outlook and implications
As the PH continues to pursue its 100-day programme, which includes
measures that all of its parties have agreed upon, the coalition
will probably appear united. The government is further likely to
reintroduce fuel subsidies, at least while oil prices are
relatively high. Given that Malaysia is a net oil exporter, higher
energy receipts should help fund such popular measures. However,
these measures will probably be balanced with a reduction in public
expenditure primarily in large infrastructure projects and a
possible cut in the number of civil service jobs.
Beyond the three-month outlook, in the absence of a common
policy platform, a slowdown in policy implementation is probable,
given the competing interests of the PH's different parties.
Divergence may be greatest regarding policies perceived to benefit
ethnic communities disproportionately. One of the PH's parties, the
Democratic Action Party (Parti Tindakan Demokratik: DAP), will
probably pursue policies favorable to ethnic minorities, but the PH
was elected on the back of support from the majority Malay
community given Mahathir's popularity among them. However, policy
differences are unlikely to result in any party threatening to
leave the PH since no single party would be able to form a majority
government outside the coalition.
Soon after his release, Anwar stated that Malaysia's affirmative
action policy granting preferential access for the majority Malay
community in public universities and government jobs should be
amended to benefit individuals meriting preferential treatment
regardless of race. Mahathir's electoral commitments towards the
Malays would make a blanket reversal of this policy untenable.
Accordingly, further public statements from Anwar that contradict
Mahathir's position would indicate growing instability within the
ruling coalition.
Furthermore, if Mahathir continues to implement policies that
are expected to dampen Malaysia's fiscal health, particularly
affecting periods subsequent to 2018, this will probably trigger
criticism from Anwar of Mahathir. Mahathir and Anwar have currently
agreed on a one-to-two-year timeline to transition the premiership,
but Anwar will probably seek a faster timeline if he believes
Mahathir's seemingly populist policies will require him to address
a weakening economy once he assumes the premiership. Statements to
this effect would be a key indicator of a potential split between
the two.