Obtain the data you need to make the most informed decisions by accessing our extensive portfolio of information, analytics, and expertise. Sign in to the product or service center of your choice.
The acting head of the US Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) is on board with working with international partners to
create a set of principles to measure risks stemming from climate
change impacts, such as rising sea levels, extreme changes in
weather, and more frequent and intense wildfires.
"I think cooperation is key in working towards a common set of
principles that can serve as a baseline" that can then be tailored
by individual jurisdictions to suit their needs, Acting SEC
Chairwoman Allison Herren Lee said during a 1 March discussion at
CERAWeek by IHS Markit.
The discussion, moderated by IHS Markit Chief Energy Strategist
Atul Arya, was centered around the need for metrics to assess
investment risks targeting environmental, sustainability and
governance, or ESG, risks as well as those related to climate
change.
The SEC for the first time in 2010 acknowledged that climate
change impacts do result in a material risk that companies, but its
recognition has never translated into the quality of disclosures
that investors such as BlackRock and institutional investors are
beginning to seek. Less than a week ago, Lee ordered the SEC to begin a
review of climate disclosure reports that companies had filed to
date.
At CERAWeek, Lee acknowledged that disclosures that companies
have made to date have been "inadequate" and insufficient for
businesses that are looking to invest in a transition to a
low-carbon future.
In crafting climate risk principles, Lee said, the SEC should
work cooperatively with its partners at home and abroad. More
importantly, she said, the SEC should not just involve investors,
but also companies that are issuing securities for critical
investments in clean energy technologies that will help them
transition to a low-carbon future.
To that end, Lee said, "the energy industry is particularly
well-positioned to lead on this issue."
She said the SEC has a key role to play as a regulator in
bringing all key constituencies, which include investors and
issuers together with financial institution as well as companies
involved in rating credit, index providers and gathering data on
climate risk.
"The question is not whether there should be regulatory
involvement: The question is what's the right approach for
regulatory involvement," Lee said. "We know the goals, and the
goals are clear."
The goal is to reach consensus on a basic principles and use
those to build metrics that are tailored to each jursidiction's
needs.
"Analysts create metrics connected to the E, the S, and G, and
businesses are competing for capital based on those metrics. We
need to capitalize on that momentum and take a holistic look at
those issues and not see mispricing of assets and misallocation of
capital. We need to be mindful of those making those decisions
based on those metrics," Lee added.
Lee acknowledged the importance and utility of voluntary climate
risk reporting frameworks, such as the one developed by the Task
Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), but also
their shortcomings.
If there is no consensus on what should be disclosed, then how
are investors to know what is being reported is reliable, she said.
"I don't think it is realistically achieving its goal."
In a panel discussion following Lee's remarks, Arya questioned
Lydie Hudson, chief executive officer for Credit Suisse's
Sustainability, Research and Investment Solutions (SRI), about what
ESG metrics have worked best for their bank.
Hudson said Credit Suisse not only considers the
industry-adopted TCFD framework among others, but also has
developed its own energy transition framework to guide companies
that come in search of investment guidance.
Also participating in this discussion was Giulia Chierchia,
executive vice president for strategy and sustainability for oil
major BP P.L.C., who agreed with Lee on a need for simple,
standardized metrics that each sector can then tailor to suit their
own needs.
Posted 01 March 2021 by Amena Saiyid, Senior Climate & Energy Research Analyst, IHS Markit